Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Shavinina (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education. Essential tensions in conceptions of giftedness: A historical-dialectical perspective. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.ĭai, D. What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed.). The Record, 58(2), 174–202.Ĭouncil for Exceptional Children. Ending discrimination in gifted education in the New York City public schools. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.Ĭommittee on Education and the Law. Iowa City, IO: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 274–282.Ĭolangelo, N., Assouline, S. Searching for answers or creating more questions? A response to Robinson. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Ĭallahan, C. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp.537–547). Evaluation as a critical component of program development and implementation. A Five-State analysis of gifted education policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.īrown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B., & Stambaugh, T. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(2), 112–122.īransford, J. (2006) Behavioral identification and assessment of gifted andtalented students. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp.293–310). Evaluating gifted programs: A broader perspective. Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Retrieved August 28, 2006, from īogdan, R. Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.īereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. Recommendations focus on urban concerns and opportunities, with an emphasis on the importance to gifted development of practice, practice, practice. Resulting changes in NYC educational practice are interpreted as a movement toward a mastery model of giftedness, including providing a flexible range of programming options to address individual students’ diverse gifted learning needs, expanded teacher development and networking opportunities, and changing identification policies. Diverse forces are at play locally, including bottom-up and top-down political pressures, concerns about equity and social justice, media responses, and changing legislation and standards. The story is grounded globally in changing understandings of teaching, learning, and expertise, based on converging evidence from developmental psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and education. New York City provides a dynamic case study of problems and possibilities in urban gifted education.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |